That paper sucked. It was poorly worded, overly dramatic, heterogenous, and the "item of pop culture" could have been more seamlessly tacked on if i had used a staplegun. I got credit for having an original point of view, but is that really worth any extra points? It isn't wisdom or intelligence that earns points, it's the arrangement of ideas on paper. People don't have any control over what pops into their heads. Shit i don't even know what i'm talking about. See what i mean? i had a decent point, but i can't write it so no one's going to think i'm smart for having it. People who have very little creative thought can still be successful scholars if their works are smart and well laid out. i would very much settle for never having a thought of my own if i could just produce every now and then. That's probably a horrible thing to wish and i should instead focus on channeling my ideas better. No, too much work. I want to trade.

I'm beginning to realize a benefit of this hurr blog thing. I can type random unfinished bits of Things and not worry about coherence or proper assembly or anything. Thank goodness. As an added bonus, no one ever sees this anymore. And maybe, after a few entries on a certain topic, i'll be able to write a paper! Huzzah! and in any case, this ought to hone my ability to transfer thought into letters, and letters into someone else's thought.